|
TRO Guidance Notes TROs deal with CRIMINAL OFFENCES relating to private sector housing for which the local authority can prosecute. The most important are harassment and unlawful eviction, offences contrary to the Protection from Eviction Act 1977. But don't forget:
1 Procedure Flowchart
2 Introduction: Customer Care
All complaints that could give rise to a criminal prosecution require information and evidence, but you also need to remember customer care. Most of these guidelines refer to TRO aims and TRO actions. However before deciding on any course of action, you need to be clear as to what the customer wants, and they need to know what you can do for them. Possibilities to consider include:
1. Reinstatement (will they be safe?)
(It is sometimes possible to get temporary accommodation from Homelessness section even if otherwise the person may be considered non-priority - if they are very shaken up by events, for example). And keep consulting/informing the customer until you close the case.
3 The First Interview
You may get referrals directly, or through the HAC or other service. Referrals may be better targeted if a form is used (see Form A)(LINK!). It is also useful to use a form to attempt to ensure that in the excitement you've still taken all the relevant information. Form B (LINK!)is a sample TRO tick sheet to use as an "aide memoire". If the person is alleging unlawful eviction, ask:
4 Emergency ActionAre they alleging their key "doesn't work"? Or that their goods are on the pavement? Or that the landlord is there and keeping them out? If so, urgently consider attending the property - with the complainant, a colleague and/or police back-up if violence is anticipated. Tell the police you need them "to prevent a breach of the peace".
5 Threatened Unlawful EvictionWhat if there is only a threat?
6 Harassment AllegationsMany people claim to be being harassed when what is going on may be very distressing - for instance, barking dogs, unruly children or the local fish and chip shop - but not harassment under the Protection from Eviction Act. Some of what is complained of may amount to statutory nuisance, which is an issue for an Environmental Health Officer. New harassment legislation provides remedies for harassment outside the residential situation. It should be the police who prosecute in these cases.
7 Taking StatementsStatements are evidence and have to comply with the Criminal Justice Act 1967, s.9 (LINK!). They are the written version of what the witness has to say, on which the decision on whether or not to proceed will be based if legal action is taken; copies will be given to the defendant. Statements should contain as much relevant information as possible, but only direct evidence, not hearsay (i.e. "he said to me ....", and not "she told me he said ....").
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
P.A.C.E. Interviews -The Caution
|
| back to contents | back to top | back to home |
9 Next Steps
- You will need to decide, with the tenant, what further action to take on the criminal side.
- If the tenant has instructed solicitors, do share information - it saves time and duplication. Stress to the tenant that you are working towards the council's criminal proceedings. Their solicitor is dealing with the tenant's rights to damages. They are separate proceedings in separate court systems, but definitely complementary, not mutually exclusive!
- If the evidence for criminal action is insufficient, it may still be possible to bring an action for damages. It can be helpful if the complainant signs a formal letter (LINK!)to his/her solicitor authorising disclosure of information and copy documents.
Criminal Prosecution
- Apart from the tenant's wishes, you will now need to consider whether it is appropriate to prosecute.
- Factors include:
- Seriousness of allegation (for example, petty nuisance v serious assault or damage to goods; persistent problems v one-off misunderstanding, etc.)
- Likelihood of recurrence (consult files for previous complaints regarding same landlord, or same tenant)
- Quality of evidence (remember if you wish to prosecute that the case will have to be proved beyond reasonable doubt)
- Public interest - is this a common problem? Is it appropriate that the alleged perpetrator be taken to Court? (consider age, mental health, etc.) What about publicity value?
- Every case must be considered on its own merits.
- Formal Cautions
- If an alleged perpetrator admits the offence and a prosecution is not appropriate, a caution can be given in writing.
- The complainant should be consulted and their views considered. You must make sure that they are aware that a formal caution would deprive them of a compensation order in the Magistrates' Court. However, if they are taking civil action, a caution could be to their advantage. The facts as put in the caution would be accepted by the Court as proved, and, when deciding the level of damages, the Court would not need to consider the question of any compensation the complainant might get in criminal proceedings.
- The accused person must admit the offence, and agree to accept a formal caution. The caution must not be used where there is insufficient evidence to prosecute. The accused person needs to be properly advised about the meaning of the formal caution before it is given - either by their own solicitor or by a more senior officer who would also administer the caution.
- You can use our suggested form (LINK!). The "Details of the Offence" should just give a narrative of what it is agreed has happened, where, and when, etc.
- A system of recording cautions needs to be established as they are admissions of guilt which should be taken into account if there is a further incident involving the same landlord.
| back to contents | back to top | back to home |
10 Written Referral for Prosecution
If you decide to go for a prosecution, cases which are to be passed to Legal Services should be done by formal written referral.
- This should include:
- A covering memorandum briefly outlining the details of the case, what evidence is enclosed and why the case seems a particularly appropriate one to prosecute. As this is a privileged communication between "client" and solicitor it can be quite subjective, and could include opinion on witnesses'/complainant's/landlord's character and/or ability to stand up to questioning
- Formal "Section 9" [Criminal Law Act, 1967] statements from the complainant and any other witnesses, the HA/TRO involved, EHOs/other council officers, police reports, photos, etc. There are forms for s.9 statements (see Appendix 2, pages 19-20). It is not a bad idea to do draft statements and get them agreed before the final version is drawn up. However drafts may have to be disclosed to the defence and thus should be kept. Remember - only DIRECT evidence is appropriate - i.e. "she said to me ...." - not "he told me that she said ...." Photographs should be marked with the date and time when taken and by whom. They should be accompanied by a s.9 statement signed by the photographer and stating where and when the photos were taken. Some landlords will not agree to formal PACE interviews, but the TRO can use properly dated file notes of any conversations with the landlord to prepare their own statements.
- Any background information, e.g. early correspondence aimed at preventing unlawful eviction, file notes of telephone conversations/meetings etc. - hence the importance of accurate record-keeping. Include previous Formal Cautions if appropriate. Remember that evidence such as rent books or Tenancy Agreements should be attached to s.9 statements.
- A statement of the TRO time spent investigating the case to date so that costs can properly be claimed in court.
- Remember to try and clearly link your evidence/memorandum to the Protection from Eviction Act.
- What do you have to show that the complainant is a residential Occupier? [s.1(1)]
- Can you show that they have not ceased to reside in the premises? [s.1(2)]
- What act(s) are complained of? [s.1(3), (3A)]
- Have you evidence of the identity of the alleged perpetrator? [s.1(3)]
- Are you claiming intent [s.1(3)] or reasonable cause? [s.1(3A)]
- You should also highlight the question of a compensation award, especially if the complainant is unlikely to get legal aid for civil proceedings. Quantify (and provide evidence of, where possible) actual losses/damage.
Legal should then advise:
- If more evidence is required (and why)
- If they feel the case is not good enough - and state why - so you can advise the complainant
- If the case is good, they should issue a summons, and advise you immediately.
- It is recommended that any Service Level Agreement clearly sets out responsibilities and response times.
| back to contents | back to top | back to home |
11 Contact with Complainant/Witnesses
In most cases, contact with the complainant and witnesses will be through the TRO. There may be circumstances where Legal Section may wish to interview or otherwise contact the complainant and/or witnesses but in these circumstances, they must advise Housing Services accordingly.
Consequently, it is up to the TRO concerned, having been advised by Legal Services of the dates of any Hearings and who will be required, to ensure that the witnesses attend at Court. In other words, write advising when and where they are required as soon as you know. Nearer the date, contact them again to remind them and make sure they understand how important it is. Arrange transport if necessary.
Remember that your witnesses may never have been in court before and may be very nervous. Try and reassure them. Islington Council use a briefing note (LINK!) for witnesses - you may like to consider adopting something similar.
Keep checking (and advise the Legal Section) if any of the witnesses has plans/a job/a pregnancy or anything that will make them unavailable on certain dates.
If civil and criminal proceedings are running in parallel it does seem appropriate that the TRO should attempt to maintain a dialogue with the complainant's civil solicitor. Information exchange can be invaluable to both sides. It is also positive in that it serves to highlight HA/TRO work to local solicitors. This does not preclude direct contact from Legal Section, but copies of any correspondence or notes of telephone calls should be provided to the TRO.
Similarly, the TRO should ensure that Legal Section are fully aware of progress/problems in any parallel civil action. This could be very important if there are problems on the civil side, with Legal Aid for example. In some cases, it might be necessary to drop the civil action - in which case it will be essential to consider the size of any compensation claim considered in criminal proceedings.
The TRO will have to attend court for the criminal proceedings if s/he is a witness. Most local authorities will require that a witness summons is served on their officer if they are required in civil proceedings, but this is generally not a problem.
Do remember that once the Legal Section has been instructed, you should not communicate directly with the landlord's solicitor - most especially if you are a witness yyourself. The solicitor will almost definitely know this, but may try to speak to you anyway!
| back to contents | back to top | back to home |
12 Closure of Case
Once a case is completed, Legal Section should formally advise Housing Services in writing of the result of any Court proceedings. Similarly, Housing Services should immediately inform Legal Services if the complainant decides to withdraw. If Court proceedings result in a bind-over (basically a promise of good behaviour), the TRO should keep the file open and encourage the complainant to report any actions which might constitute a breach. Such a file should not be closed by either Section until the period of the bind-over has expired, or any breach of a bind-over has been dealt with by the Courts.
Successful prosecutions should be publicised in the press - get advice/assistance from your press office.
| back to contents | back to top | back to home |
Appendix 1
Criminal Law Act 1977 Part II
Offences relating to Entering and Remaining on Property
section 6
(1) Subject to the following provisions of this section any person who, without lawful authority, uses or threatens violence for the purpose of securing entry into any premises for himself or for any other person is guilty of an offence, provided that -
a) there is someone present on those premises at the time who is opposed to the entry which the violence is intended to secure; and
b) the person using or threatening the violence knows that this is the case
(2) The fact that a person has any interest in or right to possession or occupation of any premises shall not for the purposes of subsection (1) above constitute lawful authority for the use or threat of violence by him or anyone else for the purpose of securing his entry into those premises.
(3) In any proceedings for an offence under this section it shall be a defence for the accused to prove -
a) that at the time of the alleged offence he or any other person on whose behalf he was acting was a displaced residential occupier of the premises in question; or
b) that part of the premises in question constitutes premises of which he or any other person on whose behalf he was acting was a displaced residential occupier and that the part of the premises to which he was seeking to secure entry constitutes an access of which he or, as the case may be, that other person is also a displaced residential occupier.
(4) It is immaterial for the purposes of this section -
a) whether the violence in question is directed against the person or against property; and
b) whether the entry which the violence is intended to secure is for the purpose of acquiring possession of the premises in question or for any other purpose.
(5) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to a fine not exceeding £1,000 or to both.
(6) A constable in uniform may arrest without warrant anyone who is, or whom he, with reasonable cause, suspects to be, guilty of an offence under this section.
(7) Section 12 below contains provisions which apply for determining when any person is to be regarded for the purposes of this Part of this Act as a displaced residential occupier of any premises or of any access to any premises.
section 7
(1) Subject to the following provisions of this section, any person who is on any premises as a trespasser after having entered as such is guilty of an offence if he fails to leave those premises on being required to do so by or on behalf of -
a) a displaced residential occupier of the premises; or
b) an individual who is a protected intending occupier of the premises by virtue of subsection (2) or subsection (4) below
(2) For the purposes of this section an individual is a protected intending occupier of any premises at any time if at that time -
a) he has in those premises a freehold interest or a leasehold interest with not less than 21 years still to run and he acquired that interest as a purchaser for money or money's worth; and
b) he requires the premises for his own occupation as a residence; and
c) he is excluded from occupation of the premises by a person who entered them, or any access to them, as a trespasser; and
d) he or a person acting on his behalf holds a written statement -
i) which specifies his interest in the premises; and
ii) which states that he requires the premises for occupation as a residence for himself, and
iii) with respect to which the requirements in subsection (3) below are fulfilled.
(3) The requirements referred to in subsection (2)(d)(iii) above are -
a) that the statement is signed by the person whose interest is specified in it in the presence of a justice of the peace or commissioner for oaths; and
b) that the justice of the peace or commissioner for oaths has subscribed his name as a witness to the signature; and a person is guilty of an offence if he makes a statement for the purposes of subsection (2)(d) above which he knows to be false in a material particular or if he recklessly makes such a statement which is false in a material particular.
(4) For the purposes of this section an individual is also a protected intending occupier of any premises at any time if at that time -
a) he has been authorised to occupy the premises as a residence by an authority to which this subsection applies; and
b) he is excluded from occupation of the premises by a person who entered the premises, or any access to them, as a trespasser; and
c) there has been issued to him by or on behalf of the authority referred to in paragraph (a) above a certificate stating that the authority is one to which this subsection applies, being of a description specified in the certificate, and that he has been authorised by the authority to occupy the premises concerned as a residence.
(5) Subsection (4) above applies to the following authorities--
a) anybody mentioned in section 14 of the Rent Act 1977 (landlord's interest belonging to local authority etc.);
b) the Housing Corporation; and
c) a housing association, within the meaning of section 189(1) of the Housing Act 1957, which is for the time being either registered in the register of housing associations established under section 13 of the Housing Act 1974 or specified in an order made by the Secretary of State under paragraph 23 of Schedule 1 to the Housing Rents and Subsidies Act 1975.
(6) In any proceedings for an offence under subsection (1) above it shall be a defence for the accused to prove that he believed that the person requiring him to leave the premises was not a displaced residential occupier or protected intending occupier of the premises or a person acting on behalf of a displaced residential occupier or protected intending occupier.
(7) In any proceedings for an offence under subsection (1) above it shall be a defence for the accused to prove -
a) that the premises in question are or form part of premises used mainly for non-residential purposes; and
b) that he was not on any part of the premises used wholly or mainly for residential purposes.
(8) In any proceedings for an offence under subsection (1) above where the accused was requested to leave the premises by a person claiming to be or to act on behalf of a protected intending occupier of the premises -
a) it shall be a defence for the accused to prove that, although asked to do so by the accused at the time the accused was requested to leave, that person failed at that time to produce to the accused such a statement as is referred to in subsection (2)(d) above or such a certificate as is referred to in subsection (4)(c) above; and
b) any document purporting to be a certificate under subsection (4)(c) above shall be received in evidence and, unless the contrary is proved, shall be deemed to have been issued by or on behalf of the authority stated in the certificate.
(9) Any reference in the preceding provisions of this section other than subsections (2) to (4) above, to any premises includes a reference to any access to them, whether or not any such access itself constitutes premises, within the meaning of this Part of this Act; and a person who is a protected intending occupier of any premises shall be regarded for the purposes of this section as a protected intending occupier also of any access to those premises.
(10) A person guilty of an offence under subsection (1) or (3) above shall be liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to a fine not exceeding £1,000 or to both.
(11) A constable in uniform may arrest without warrant anyone who is, or whom he, with reasonable cause, suspects to be, guilty of an offence under subsection (1) above.
| back to contents | back to top | back to home |
Appendix 2
Taking Statements
1. Name and address
2. Accommodation - full address, extent and location (e.g. third floor front room, sharing W.C. with 2 others, etc.)
3. How accommodation found/entered into (e.g. Agency, ad in local paper, Post Office, friends)
4. Landlord's or agent's full name, address, etc.
5. Rent and rent history (including reasons for any arrears)
6. Any previous problems/disputes
7. Other agencies involved, if any
8. Witness details
9. History/description of events
REMEMBER - no "hearsay" (i.e. "she told me he said .... !")
Use the statement forms below. Forms for hand-written statements have dotted lines across. Use only one side of the paper, and typed versions should be double-spaced. All surnames should be in capitals.
download this form (LINK!)
|
STATEMENT OF WITNESS (C.J. Act, 1967, S.9; M.C. Act. 1980, S.102; M.C. Rules, 1981, r.70)
Statement of ............................................................................................................................................
Address and Telephone Number .......................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................... This statement, consisting of pages each signed by me, is true to the best of my knowledge and belief and I make it knowing that, if it is tendered in evidence, I shall be liable to prosecution if I have wilfully stated in it anything which I know to be false or do not believe to be true. Dated the day of Signed ..................................................................Witnessed by ...........................................................
|
|
STATEMENT OF WITNESS (C.J. Act, 1967, S.9; M.C. Act. 1980, S.102; M.C. Rules, 1981, r.70) continuation of statement of ..................................................................................................Page number ............
Signed ..................................................................Witnessed by ........................................................... |